Last comments
In general, I understand it is about music and films.
PS: By the way, I am not such a moralphage as I might seem. I have nothing against being naked, it even makes me happy, and violence, if it is appropriate, does not bother me at all. But here is the music made in order to throw wheels under it in clubs and the current culture of people upsets me. In conversations, almost nothing good was left (:
PS: By the way, I am not such a moralphage as I might seem. I have nothing against being naked, it even makes me happy, and violence, if it is appropriate, does not bother me at all. But here is the music made in order to throw wheels under it in clubs and the current culture of people upsets me. In conversations, almost nothing good was left (:
Quote: Krylov1998
Rather, not "I hate", but "I do not feel comfortable."
It's the same with me. Back in the 2000s, I was comfortable, but now ... The age of shitty films, poor music, obsession with technology. Everything in these iPads, iPhones, etc. But still, you write that:
Quote: Krylov1998
I cannot feel like a part of modern life.
As I already wrote, it was not so different in America in the 70s and 80s. The sexual revolution had already taken place, and the screens began to show nudity and violence. Even toilet comedies were, for example, The Smoked 1978. But, of course, not so miserable and in not such a terrifying number as now. Nowadays, they have really forgotten how to make ordinary good films. Therefore, the question is, what do you see as a special difference between that time and ours? I personally see that that time was not so "degraded" or something, in comparison with ours, but it was then that all the foundations were laid for what made our decade what it has become.
Yeah, I was really hoping that Part 5 would come out in September.
Krylov1998, I don't know if you saw it or not, but I answered you in the topic about nightclubs.
Krylov1998, I don't know if you saw it or not, but I answered you in the topic about nightclubs.
Quote: NoxchoBoy
So this is not the same Dennis.
Anyway, Aunt Franklin's name is just another Easter egg.
Quote: Valmorie
She lives in about the same area, has the same character, still wears dreadlocks ... no, not her at all
Okay, but why did she turn black?) Here, there is no point in blaming everything on Sanya's bad graphics
Quote: Valmorie
What about Franklin's Aunt Dennis?)
Why does everyone think she's the same Dennis from San Andreas? I just didn't play part 5, maybe it says about it. But outwardly, Dennis was much lighter, more like a Latina than an African.
By the way, I would really like Rockstar to return to the heroes of the GTA 3 world again, but this is very unlikely (:! {::} Only For a racing lover.
Post edited by plankton8 on 07/26/2014 at 13:19:45
Post edited by plankton8 on 07/26/2014 at 13:19:45
His life has battered too much, judging by his face) His eyes turned gray instead of brown, his whole face was in veins. By the way, the first main character of GTA with bright eyes was Johnny Klebitz. This is so, an unnecessary fact to anyone)
Hurry up the 2nd option. The universe of GTA 3 and the universe of the 4th and 5th parts are different. As I understand it, the developers decided to create a new one because of the cities, tk. they change too much. How to explain, for example, that Liberty City of Claude 2001 has nothing to do with Liberty Nico 2008? Or that Los Santos of the 5th part is just as different from San Andreas? Don't make them the same cities every time.
The post has been edited by Clod27 on 07-26-2014 at 11:00:10 AM
Quote: maxandmov
As far as I know, they all supposedly died / never existed.
Hurry up the 2nd option. The universe of GTA 3 and the universe of the 4th and 5th parts are different. As I understand it, the developers decided to create a new one because of the cities, tk. they change too much. How to explain, for example, that Liberty City of Claude 2001 has nothing to do with Liberty Nico 2008? Or that Los Santos of the 5th part is just as different from San Andreas? Don't make them the same cities every time.
The post has been edited by Clod27 on 07-26-2014 at 11:00:10 AM
Quote: KilleR ™
Give me 40s
Believe it or not, it would have been the perfect time for me if it hadn't been for the war. And, of course, I'm talking about America, in Russia then there was complete poverty. In the USA, it was not very good either, only the Great Depression ended, again the war also affected them, but still there were many good clubs, there was wonderful music (jazz and blues), I also like films of this period, especially noir films. In general, the culture of that period is close to me. In general, I began to study the American 40s after Mafia 2, painfully the atmosphere of this time turned out to be wonderful there.
Quote: Krylov1998
Of course, I'm not a fan of glamor and modern nightclubs (I like the 70s-80s nightclubs more)
I read your message and immediately went to your profile. You seem to be a smart guy)) But I didn't understand something. You hate the modern lifestyle, but you love the 80s, although the culture of people has hardly changed over these 30 years (I'm talking about America, we had a Union). In the clubs, of course, much more pleasant music was played, but nevertheless, people in them were doing the same thing as now. More precisely, they booted, took LSD, fucked in toilets, etc. Instead of hipsters, they had yuppies, who were also despised by everyone) There were enough good films, but at the same time, there was also an abundance of violence on the screen.
As for the 70s, then people felt freedom and a decadent style reigned everywhere. Recently there was a sexual revolution, films about strippers, LSD and sex began to appear.
Of course, as in our years, then not everyone did this, there were many cultured people, but still. So, the question is, why do you think that everything was different then?
The post has been edited by Clod27 on 07/22/2014 at 12:21:42 PM
I have not played GTA 5, but she will have to try very hard to like me more than San Andreas.