Last comments
In support, to be honest, useless vegetables. There was a case when GTA could not start for one reason. I turned to them, nothing useful came of it. Later I turned to a friend, got a couple of tips and everything worked out! Support he stupidly is and to sense 0
Monstchin 08/08/2018, 09:25:57
Fakes are cool when they rub them into you
About GTA itself. If GTA 6 comes out with a used city of the GTA series, then I won’t take it for free. in addition, reviews in the incentive crap, and drive in the store piss.
About GTA itself. If GTA 6 comes out with a used city of the GTA series, then I won’t take it for free. in addition, reviews in the incentive crap, and drive in the store piss.
Link to the comment
Gta online is enough for 10 years in any case, but we'll see.
they are added as yet, but it is common for everyone to keep silent about it.
oddly enough, the number of players every year only grows ...
Quote: FerrumBOY
You can add a huge number of Easter eggs and "myths".
they are added as yet, but it is common for everyone to keep silent about it.
Quote: Dimon__gta
SAMP sends you greetings)
oddly enough, the number of players every year only grows ...
oh, class, free prefix! I'll get it!
TheInsaneKiller 06/11/2018, 17:24:29
Mat. Warning issued, comment edited.
TheInsaneKiller 06/11/2018, 17:24:29
We didn’t come up with anything better than porting the old, shabby game in all poses to the offended console. Respect!
When accidentally they stumbled PPC enraged
Decided to finish off and San Andreas me? Oh, thanks!
Decided to finish off and San Andreas me? Oh, thanks!
In the role of administrator, I would immediately drip from my status, then start playing as admin stuff, pay attention to each user's position and drip even more from congratulations and increase my reputation. Well, a month or two I rejoiced, you have to do something, make the font 2 more or less, rearrange the advertisement on the other side, assign such a hat to it. And that’s it! Do not quibble! How would the update be? IT WAS! It’s necessary to do something else with the site team, for example, in Moder’s composition, the 2 youngest ones are supposed to be removed for low activity and not offended, there’s a reason for everything! We need to create a couple of fakes and give it in moderation, the rest should be told that these are paid experienced moderators with 15 years of experience on a portal that has naturally closed already. Cut the tasks of Andre, let the contest do something, okay, I don’t care, 20% of that advertisement will be the budget of the contest. YES AND NORM! Let's heal!
Well, at least in the GTA snow let it fall while the rains are pouring. Norm theme. +
Wiseguy Tollend ,
Sorry cido much already!
Wiseguy Tollend ,
Sorry cido much already!
I was glad to participate, but at least somehow my reputation was restored, which I leaked out of hindsight.
Judging by the description, it’s not bad, but for the sake of this, I won’t download United because the mod itself is crooked ..
And a separate plus for the fact that I managed to create something in United, I tried, but it is full of crashes, especially when choosing objects.
And a separate plus for the fact that I managed to create something in United, I tried, but it is full of crashes, especially when choosing objects.
I didn’t play and I’m not going to, but I liked the built interior of the church
And I seem to have gotten lucky, he put me a plus
Quote: FarmerKarwer
put minuses to anyone and anyhow
And I seem to have gotten lucky, he put me a plus
Quote: SatournFan
so, "Russian security company"
pluses:
- good action component;
- there are no critical errors like spawn-overspawn in the frame and so on. (except for a long trip from San Fierro to Los Santos in one of the missions);
- there are good ideas, while well implemented;
- the soundtrack is not distracting, so you can’t record it in the minuses, but it does not add anything to the missions, just the music in the background. In addition, the volume is calibrated, which is undoubtedly commendable
cons:
- the dialogues are poor. I’ll add here one more minus - errors in the text. they, again, are not distracting, but sometimes they look too stupid;
- too simple in technical terms
Verdict: 3/5, no rating
as I wrote above, a very simple technical project, but at the same time solid, it is clear that the author put his soul into it. if this project came out 4 years ago, it wouldn’t have a price, but for 2017 it’s a bit poor
pluses:
- good action component;
- there are no critical errors like spawn-overspawn in the frame and so on. (except for a long trip from San Fierro to Los Santos in one of the missions);
- there are good ideas, while well implemented;
- the soundtrack is not distracting, so you can’t record it in the minuses, but it does not add anything to the missions, just the music in the background. In addition, the volume is calibrated, which is undoubtedly commendable
cons:
- the dialogues are poor. I’ll add here one more minus - errors in the text. they, again, are not distracting, but sometimes they look too stupid;
- too simple in technical terms
Verdict: 3/5, no rating
as I wrote above, a very simple technical project, but at the same time solid, it is clear that the author put his soul into it. if this project came out 4 years ago, it wouldn’t have a price, but for 2017 it’s a bit poor
Thanks for the tip, just read it right now.
And that’s why the dialogs are poor and what they didn’t like if it’s not difficult then please write me a PM about it
Quote: SatournFan
so, "Russian security company"
pluses:
- good action component;
- there are no critical errors like spawn-overspawn in the frame and so on. (except for a long trip from San Fierro to Los Santos in one of the missions);
- there are good ideas, while well implemented;
- the soundtrack is not distracting, so you can’t record it in the minuses, but it does not add anything to the missions, just the music in the background. In addition, the volume is calibrated, which is undoubtedly commendable
cons:
- the dialogues are poor. I’ll add here one more minus - errors in the text. they, again, are not distracting, but sometimes they look too stupid;
- too simple in technical terms
Verdict: 3/5, no rating
as I wrote above, a very simple technical project, but at the same time solid, it is clear that the author put his soul into it. if this project came out 4 years ago, it wouldn’t have a price, but for 2017 it’s a bit poor
pluses:
- good action component;
- there are no critical errors like spawn-overspawn in the frame and so on. (except for a long trip from San Fierro to Los Santos in one of the missions);
- there are good ideas, while well implemented;
- the soundtrack is not distracting, so you can’t record it in the minuses, but it does not add anything to the missions, just the music in the background. In addition, the volume is calibrated, which is undoubtedly commendable
cons:
- the dialogues are poor. I’ll add here one more minus - errors in the text. they, again, are not distracting, but sometimes they look too stupid;
- too simple in technical terms
Verdict: 3/5, no rating
as I wrote above, a very simple technical project, but at the same time solid, it is clear that the author put his soul into it. if this project came out 4 years ago, it wouldn’t have a price, but for 2017 it’s a bit poor
Thanks for the tip, just read it right now.
And that’s why the dialogs are poor and what they didn’t like if it’s not difficult then please write me a PM about it
Quote: SatournFan
so, "Russian security company"
pluses:
- good action component;
- there are no critical errors like spawn-overspawn in the frame and so on. (except for a long trip from San Fierro to Los Santos in one of the missions);
- there are good ideas, while well implemented;
- the soundtrack is not distracting, so you can’t record it in the minuses, but it does not add anything to the missions, just the music in the background. In addition, the volume is calibrated, which is undoubtedly commendable
cons:
- the dialogues are poor. I’ll add here one more minus - errors in the text. they, again, are not distracting, but sometimes they look too stupid;
- too simple in technical terms
Verdict: 3/5, no rating
as I wrote above, a very simple technical project, but at the same time solid, it is clear that the author put his soul into it. if this project came out 4 years ago, it wouldn’t have a price, but for 2017 it’s a bit poor
pluses:
- good action component;
- there are no critical errors like spawn-overspawn in the frame and so on. (except for a long trip from San Fierro to Los Santos in one of the missions);
- there are good ideas, while well implemented;
- the soundtrack is not distracting, so you can’t record it in the minuses, but it does not add anything to the missions, just the music in the background. In addition, the volume is calibrated, which is undoubtedly commendable
cons:
- the dialogues are poor. I’ll add here one more minus - errors in the text. they, again, are not distracting, but sometimes they look too stupid;
- too simple in technical terms
Verdict: 3/5, no rating
as I wrote above, a very simple technical project, but at the same time solid, it is clear that the author put his soul into it. if this project came out 4 years ago, it wouldn’t have a price, but for 2017 it’s a bit poor
Thanks for the tip, just read it right now.
And that’s why the dialogs are poor and what they didn’t like if it’s not difficult then please write me a PM about it
Quote: SatournFan
so, "Russian security company"
pluses:
- good action component;
- there are no critical errors like spawn-overspawn in the frame and so on. (except for a long trip from San Fierro to Los Santos in one of the missions);
- there are good ideas, while well implemented;
- the soundtrack is not distracting, so you can’t record it in the minuses, but it does not add anything to the missions, just the music in the background. In addition, the volume is calibrated, which is undoubtedly commendable
cons:
- the dialogues are poor. I’ll add here one more minus - errors in the text. they, again, are not distracting, but sometimes they look too stupid;
- too simple in technical terms
Verdict: 3/5, no rating
as I wrote above, a very simple technical project, but at the same time solid, it is clear that the author put his soul into it. if this project came out 4 years ago, it wouldn’t have a price, but for 2017 it’s a bit poor
pluses:
- good action component;
- there are no critical errors like spawn-overspawn in the frame and so on. (except for a long trip from San Fierro to Los Santos in one of the missions);
- there are good ideas, while well implemented;
- the soundtrack is not distracting, so you can’t record it in the minuses, but it does not add anything to the missions, just the music in the background. In addition, the volume is calibrated, which is undoubtedly commendable
cons:
- the dialogues are poor. I’ll add here one more minus - errors in the text. they, again, are not distracting, but sometimes they look too stupid;
- too simple in technical terms
Verdict: 3/5, no rating
as I wrote above, a very simple technical project, but at the same time solid, it is clear that the author put his soul into it. if this project came out 4 years ago, it wouldn’t have a price, but for 2017 it’s a bit poor
Thanks for the tip, just read it right now.
And that’s why the dialogs are poor and what they didn’t like if it’s not difficult then please write me a PM about it
Hmm, I’ve gone and got a little bit crazy. Cutscenes with 3 words for 10 seconds. Already in 2010 there were few such missions. Here or some kind of trolling or author really took up the DIOM for the first time. But the first work here is not an option to upload, there should be only high-quality content.
I heard something similar about 5 years ago from Chester, I even received screenshots from him