Last comments
Quote: MrBlackMorgan
Carver, you yourself said that Santa has a whole nation of fans who make up any of his projects, but at the same time you yourself made such a project in which the same thing happened. They bet a lot plus not playing or not finishing the game.
Thanks for the feedback. As for this, I can only say that you yourself do not judge the entire project solely on the review of Vir. Many people played to the end and rated the project (Saturnfan, YSV, DumPlay, WMMIPOPO, BurgerKo, wir - this list can be continued further), while the downloads are MUCH MORE than the ratings. And you, I wonder, who will you bring here, who did not fully play, except Asindu27a?
Quote: MrBlackMorgan
The project is not bad, but on the part of the scripters the work has been done better than yours.
Of course, no one is going to dispute this. I will say more, without their help there would be no project. But ... agree ... what can a scripter miscalculate? In coding? The project is completely different, and it's silly to compare the work of scripters and work in DYOM itself.
Quote: MrBlackMorgan
I hope you get better and understand your mistake. Do not miscalculate anymore!
I understood it before the release of the review, namely, the not-well-developed project. It could have been better done, but I hurried. The next time this will not happen again.
FarmerKarwer 09/21/2017, 05:38:37
Quote: Valik_2005
Admins of the site, and this is Andre, Badman and others. Of course, I’m sure that articles from this person are very suitable, but damn ... This is corny
No one argues that it is trite, but the admins themselves gave the task to this person, because such queries are most often searched.
I was a tester of the project, I really liked it. I recommend everyone to the passage.
I did not expect to see a screenshot of At The Limit here, because it was released in the autumn of the first of September
In general, I would like even more activity, as it was 2012-2014. There are still a bunch of ideas for mods.
It is also a pity that the mods for GTA V or GTA IV do not fall into the TOP at all, few people download and evaluate them, even if the mod is very cool. But then TOP of the best files are occupied by GTA SA mods, although some mods are not of the best quality.
FarmerKarwer 09/14/2017, 07:15:38
In general, I would like even more activity, as it was 2012-2014. There are still a bunch of ideas for mods.
It is also a pity that the mods for GTA V or GTA IV do not fall into the TOP at all, few people download and evaluate them, even if the mod is very cool. But then TOP of the best files are occupied by GTA SA mods, although some mods are not of the best quality.
FarmerKarwer 09/14/2017, 07:15:38
After playing a mission, I can say that not everyone can understand the meaning. For example me. But for myself, I found a philosophical message ... This is a message for three letters of each player that will play into it. This is a fat banter over the community and, perhaps, banter over the very human desires and aspirations. This is a hack-work, performed in 1-3 days, which is capable with violent cruelty to rape the brains, if only try to understand the logic of the events. And the ratings, pluses there is really no use, the goal of the authors is completely different. Perhaps this is a mockery of the community, which either shavaev surreal hackle and yet thank you for saying such creativity, or blow up their fart in the comments after the passage of the mission.
In general, the content of the project, you can determine what is in the minds of the creator-her / I. However, this applies in general to any kind of creativity, not only to duom.
In general, the content of the project, you can determine what is in the minds of the creator-her / I. However, this applies in general to any kind of creativity, not only to duom.
Quote: TAIRS
Sorry Carver, but I'm here to advertise
Small ad: My soon
Stealth project, I think you will like it, the release is coming soon
Small ad: My soon
Stealth project, I think you will like it, the release is coming soon
This can be done in the signature so that such an entry appears under all comments. To do this, go to your profile settings
Quote: Bobby
In general, the story will only go to schoolchildren.
Moreover, the primary classes.
Thank you for the plus
Well, here with a 90% probability the problem is in the script, because when you write in DYOM, then all the opcodes are made by a robot, not a person, robots tend to make mistakes
I’m such a script from myself (it’s more correct to say, no one, although I know something firsthand and have done simple scripts before). That is the point. Undoubtedly, there are very few possibilities in the diome (at least for my ambitious ideas), therefore, in order to create horror, I had to resort to the help of one good scripter.
As the developer of this project, I can say with 100% certainty that it is IMPOSSIBLE to create a suitable horror in the diome without scripts.
Quote: Asind
Well, here with a 90% probability the problem is in the script, because when you write in DYOM, then all the opcodes are made by a robot, not a person, robots tend to make mistakes
I’m such a script from myself (it’s more correct to say, no one, although I know something firsthand and have done simple scripts before). That is the point. Undoubtedly, there are very few possibilities in the diome (at least for my ambitious ideas), therefore, in order to create horror, I had to resort to the help of one good scripter.
As the developer of this project, I can say with 100% certainty that it is IMPOSSIBLE to create a suitable horror in the diome without scripts.
Quote: Asind
I put a plus for this project for quality, I won’t download, I don’t want to see crashes that cannot be eliminated in a trite way.
You didn’t put a plus
As for the departures, someone will do it. There are people who have never flown out for the whole passage, there are those who could have flown out at the end / beginning of missions.
Quote: Slippers
1) Let the work with scripts was excellent, but again, as I put it above, there is one problem: in the moment with Alina, in theory, when GG was confined to a chair, I could walk. The script, apparently, was not fixed, or it was only with me, because my game is littered with a bunch of scripts.
Only you, others did not have this, so this is not a minus.
Quote: Slippers
2) Spawn actors in the frame. You said that you will try to fix them by putting a script actor. Well, where are they? Sorry, Carver, sorry.
Spawn? A lot of them? Personally, I noticed, and you pointed me to only one (in the sixth mission). I did not dare to fix it, because I did not want to additionally load the game with scripts and there were still my reasons why I did not want to do this. Well, you can still call it a minus, okay.
Quote: Slippers
There is nothing wrong with that, but Slender and SSC are too much.
Why didn’t you immediately tell me about this, how did you test? About SCP, you said, “so it came in handy from the last project.” Double standarts? Or just noticed?
Quote: Slippers
but technically, to be honest, raw.
As I noticed from your criticism, only because of the spawn of the actor in the frame.
FarmerKarwer 09/03/2017, 04:31:42
Quote: Slippers
1) Let the work with scripts was excellent, but again, as I put it above, there is one problem: in the moment with Alina, in theory, when GG was confined to a chair, I could walk. The script, apparently, was not fixed, or it was only with me, because my game is littered with a bunch of scripts.
Only you, others did not have this, so this is not a minus.
Quote: Slippers
2) Spawn actors in the frame. You said that you will try to fix them by putting a script actor. Well, where are they? Sorry, Carver, sorry.
Spawn? A lot of them? Personally, I noticed, and you pointed me to only one (in the sixth mission). I did not dare to fix it, because I did not want to additionally load the game with scripts and there were still my reasons why I did not want to do this. Well, you can still call it a minus, okay.
Quote: Slippers
There is nothing wrong with that, but Slender and SSC are too much.
Why didn’t you immediately tell me about this, how did you test? About SCP, you said, “so it came in handy from the last project.” Double standarts? Or just noticed?
Quote: Slippers
but technically, to be honest, raw.
As I noticed from your criticism, only because of the spawn of the actor in the frame.
FarmerKarwer 09/03/2017, 04:31:42
Why didn’t you immediately tell me about this, how did you test? About SCP, you said, “so it came in handy from the last project.” Double standarts? Or just noticed?
As I noticed from your criticism, only because of the spawn of the actor in the frame.
FarmerKarwer 09/03/2017, 04:31:42
Quote: Slippers
but technically, to be honest, raw.
As I noticed from your criticism, only because of the spawn of the actor in the frame.
FarmerKarwer 09/03/2017, 04:31:42
Quote: Slippers
1) Let the work with scripts was excellent, but again, as I put it above, there is one problem: in the moment with Alina, in theory, when GG was confined to a chair, I could walk. The script, apparently, was not fixed, or it was only with me, because my game is littered with a bunch of scripts.
Only you, others did not have this, so this is not a minus.
Quote: Slippers
2) Spawn actors in the frame. You said that you will try to fix them by putting a script actor. Well, where are they? Sorry, Carver, sorry.
Spawn? A lot of them? Personally, I noticed, and you pointed me to only one (in the sixth mission). I did not dare to fix it, because I did not want to additionally load the game with scripts and there were still my reasons why I did not want to do this. Well, you can still call it a minus, okay.
Quote: Slippers
There is nothing wrong with that, but Slender and SSC are too much.
Why didn’t you immediately tell me about this, how did you test? About SCP, you said, “so it came in handy from the last project.” Double standarts? Or just noticed?
Quote: Slippers
but technically, to be honest, raw.
As I noticed from your criticism, only because of the spawn of the actor in the frame.
FarmerKarwer 09/03/2017, 04:31:42
Quote: ShEbUREK
It's a pity that the cities were not exposed to thickets of trees, bushes and grass!
In fact, it should be so, modify it!
In fact, it should be so, modify it!
It should not be, because the beginning of the apocalypse was not so much time.
A real simulator of the Bolshevik, here you can shoot in droves enemies of the people, who for some reason pretend to be zombies
10 annoying and inadequate hunters out of 10!
FarmerKarwer 08/29/2017, 12:55:13
10 annoying and inadequate hunters out of 10!
FarmerKarwer 08/29/2017, 12:55:13
A useful topic, you can use this script to create a chronology of the development of events in the storyline.
I also remember your project with RosKomNadzor, which was rejected.
There is progress, though very good
There is progress, though very good
So, the project “Rush to Love” is probably one of the best projects about love. Because there are almost no projects about it.
Stupid plot, stupid dialogs, and generally stupid EVERYTHING ... This gives reason to put a minus, even though the project was kind of the first of its kind.
Stupid plot, stupid dialogs, and generally stupid EVERYTHING ... This gives reason to put a minus, even though the project was kind of the first of its kind.
Quote: GHETTOSUNRISE
But I kept a couple of screenshots in my blozik: 3
See how you would not be given a couple of years of strict labor.
Quote: GHETTOSUNRISE
! { tag_3}!Are we waiting for the gulfs or not?No, what else is the gulf? Vidos was removed by the FSB officers, and the authors of the video are awaiting trial in the investigation to the detention center for the disclosure of state secrets
Quote: SuberSeb
You talked about "military needs," and state. institutions and military needs are not the same thing.
Okay, I said a little. The processor is still in demand in important government institutions.
Quote: SuberSeb
I'm talking about performance.
I already explained everything in the previous comment.
Quote: FarmerKarwer
it requires processors with an increased level of security and protection against computer viruses, while possessing such power that allows you to perform the necessary tasks.
They (these institutions and the military) still have enough of this power, but this does not mean that our techies will rest on their laurels.
Quote: SuberSeb
That's it. State institutions - yes, they will. Private companies and entrepreneurs are unlikely, because for 200 pieces you can buy a lot of better things. Regular users will buy only in a state of insanity.
So where did I start my first comment?)
Quote: SuberSeb
And how will he show himself to the state. structures is a completely different issue.
Very good, he also enjoys demand there. Let me remind you once again that processors are required that have an increased level of security and protection against computer viruses, while possessing such power that allows you to perform the necessary tasks. At the same time, computers and servers offered by the MCST company are able to function in adverse environmental conditions.
FarmerKarwer 07/27/2017, 10:40:44
Quote: SuberSeb
So such a title would not be good, since it is far from reality.
Similarly, about the new domestic processor
Quote: SuberSeb
I consider this processor in the context of applications in ordinary tasks, and not in the defense industry and the state. institutions, because developers say that it can be used in the office.
Then yes, you're right about that for common tasks it is low-power compared to the same Intel. The developers correctly stated that this percent can be used in the office. Maybe so! True minus in its price, therefore ordinary entrepreneurs hardly buy such a processor. But for various private security agencies, as well as various government agencies where resistance to hacker attacks and information security are required, Elbrus is an excellent solution.
Alright, it's time to end our argument, anyway, none of us will convince each other of our innocence ...
Quote: SuberSeb
So such a title would not be good, since it is far from reality.
Similarly, about the new domestic processor
Quote: SuberSeb
I consider this processor in the context of applications in ordinary tasks, and not in the defense industry and the state. institutions, because developers say that it can be used in the office.
Then yes, you're right about that for common tasks it is low-power compared to the same Intel. The developers correctly stated that this percent can be used in the office. Maybe so! True minus in its price, therefore ordinary entrepreneurs hardly buy such a processor. But for various private security agencies, as well as various government agencies where resistance to hacker attacks and information security are required, Elbrus is an excellent solution.
Alright, it's time to end our argument, anyway, none of us will convince each other of our innocence ...
Quote: SuberSeb
So such a title would not be good, since it is far from reality.
Similarly, about the new domestic processor
Quote: SuberSeb
I consider this processor in the context of applications in ordinary tasks, and not in the defense industry and the state. institutions, because developers say that it can be used in the office.
Then yes, you're right about that for common tasks it is low-power compared to the same Intel. The developers correctly stated that this percent can be used in the office. Maybe so! True minus in its price, therefore ordinary entrepreneurs hardly buy such a processor. But for various private security agencies, as well as various government agencies where resistance to hacker attacks and information security are required, Elbrus is an excellent solution.
Alright, it's time to end our argument, anyway, none of us will convince each other of our innocence ...
Quote: SuberSeb
So such a title would not be good, since it is far from reality.
Similarly, about the new domestic processor
Quote: SuberSeb
I consider this processor in the context of applications in ordinary tasks, and not in the defense industry and the state. institutions, because developers say that it can be used in the office.
Then yes, you're right about that for common tasks it is low-power compared to the same Intel. The developers correctly stated that this percent can be used in the office. Maybe so! True minus in its price, therefore ordinary entrepreneurs hardly buy such a processor. But for various private security agencies, as well as various government agencies where resistance to hacker attacks and information security are required, Elbrus is an excellent solution.
Alright, it's time to end our argument, anyway, none of us will convince each other of our innocence ...
Quote: SuberSeb
"The new domestic processor shows the console performance of 2005," would be a great headline.
"The modern Intel Core i7-7700K processor is inferior in 2005 console performance" would be a great title too
FarmerKarwer 07/28/2017, 10:04:32
Quote: SuberSeb
Xbox 360 issues 260 Gflops. Video card Titan Z 8 teraflops.
Lol, these are not processors at all.
Quote: SuberSeb
All predecessors were at the level of ancient procs, this one, most likely, will not make a strong leap forward.
Well, let's see, time will tell.
Quote: SuberSeb
Need to compare with new ones. My i7-7700K produces almost 240 Gflops.
Then come on and compare with new ones. Productivity (peak) of "Elbrus 8C" - 250 Gflops.
Quote: SuberSeb
And who are these "all"? Do you have a financial report or some data?
Where did you see that I wrote the word "everything"?
And I already wrote about everything in the comments earlier, the point is now to dispute something.
Quote: SuberSeb
For the military or not, the developers say that it can also be used for office purposes. The scope is as follows: information security, operating temperature range, product life cycle duration. That is, the scope of military needs is not limited. Since he is for military purposes, then why can any mortal buy it? Truly military-oriented products are not handed out for reviews.
In my opinion, I clearly wrote that the main feature of Elbrus is its computing power. Why does he not pull the game, despite its high performance (by the way, the 4C processor's efficiency is comparable to the Intel “i” series processors. With less power consumption (45 W) its performance is up to 50 GFlops. For comparison: the older Intel Core i7- Does the 975 Extreme Edition have a performance of 53 Gflops at much higher frequencies and power consumption)?
The answer to the question is simple: our processor is simply “sharpened” for another!
Quote: SuberSeb
Not in stores, because he doesn’t need anyone. And you can order here. And there is a description where not a word is said about the "military". For office needs.
It is precisely that simple users do not need it in FIG. And why then ours still buy this "Elbrus" if it is, as you say, "worse than Intela in everything"? In which office establishments is Elbrus most in demand? Why not Intel? The answer to all questions is its purpose. And we already spoke about the goal.
Quote: SuberSeb
800 MHz in 2017 is definitely something to be proud of.
Where do you get this info? If you are talking about the state of our line of processors for 2017, then here are the characteristics of the new Elbrus 8C:
Processor - 8 cores without hypertreading.
The crystal area is 350 mm2.
The cache of the second level for each core is 512 Sq.
Layer 3 cache is shared - 16 MB.
Execution per cycle - 30 operations.
Performance (peak) - 250 Gflops.
Power - 60-90 watts.
Licensed independence from Intel, while providing support for major operating systems with x86 / x86-64 architecture.
The crystal area is 350 mm2.
The cache of the second level for each core is 512 Sq.
Layer 3 cache is shared - 16 MB.
Execution per cycle - 30 operations.
Performance (peak) - 250 Gflops.
Power - 60-90 watts.
Licensed independence from Intel, while providing support for major operating systems with x86 / x86-64 architecture.
You just got used to the fact that the power of the processor is measured by the way it pulls modern games. And this, by the way, is correct, but for processors that are aimed at a wide range of consumers. Here, such a scheme will not work, a slightly different scope.
So it goes.
FarmerKarwer 07/27/2017, 09:01:31
Quote: SuberSeb
For the military or not, the developers say that it can also be used for office purposes. The scope is as follows: information security, operating temperature range, product life cycle duration. That is, the scope of military needs is not limited. Since he is for military purposes, then why can any mortal buy it? Truly military-oriented products are not handed out for reviews.
In my opinion, I clearly wrote that the main feature of Elbrus is its computing power. Why does he not pull the game, despite its high performance (by the way, the 4C processor's efficiency is comparable to the Intel “i” series processors. With less power consumption (45 W) its performance is up to 50 GFlops. For comparison: the older Intel Core i7- Does the 975 Extreme Edition have a performance of 53 Gflops at much higher frequencies and power consumption)?
The answer to the question is simple: our processor is simply “sharpened” for another!
Quote: SuberSeb
Not in stores, because he doesn’t need anyone. And you can order here. And there is a description where not a word is said about the "military". For office needs.
It is precisely that simple users do not need it in FIG. And why then ours still buy this "Elbrus" if it is, as you say, "worse than Intela in everything"? In which office establishments is Elbrus most in demand? Why not Intel? The answer to all questions is its purpose. And we already spoke about the goal.
Quote: SuberSeb
800 MHz in 2017 is definitely something to be proud of.
Where do you get this info? If you are talking about the state of our line of processors for 2017, then here are the characteristics of the new Elbrus 8C:
Processor - 8 cores without hypertreading.
The crystal area is 350 mm2.
The cache of the second level for each core is 512 Sq.
Layer 3 cache is shared - 16 MB.
Execution per cycle - 30 operations.
Performance (peak) - 250 Gflops.
Power - 60-90 watts.
Licensed independence from Intel, while providing support for major operating systems with x86 / x86-64 architecture.
The crystal area is 350 mm2.
The cache of the second level for each core is 512 Sq.
Layer 3 cache is shared - 16 MB.
Execution per cycle - 30 operations.
Performance (peak) - 250 Gflops.
Power - 60-90 watts.
Licensed independence from Intel, while providing support for major operating systems with x86 / x86-64 architecture.
You just got used to the fact that the power of the processor is measured by the way it pulls modern games. And this, by the way, is correct, but for processors that are aimed at a wide range of consumers. Here, such a scheme will not work, a slightly different scope.
So it goes.
FarmerKarwer 07/27/2017, 09:01:31
Quote: SuberSeb
For the military or not, the developers say that it can also be used for office purposes. The scope is as follows: information security, operating temperature range, product life cycle duration. That is, the scope of military needs is not limited. Since he is for military purposes, then why can any mortal buy it? Truly military-oriented products are not handed out for reviews.
In my opinion, I clearly wrote that the main feature of Elbrus is its computing power. Why does he not pull the game, despite its high performance (by the way, the 4C processor's efficiency is comparable to the Intel “i” series processors. With less power consumption (45 W) its performance is up to 50 GFlops. For comparison: the older Intel Core i7- Does the 975 Extreme Edition have a performance of 53 Gflops at much higher frequencies and power consumption)?
The answer to the question is simple: our processor is simply “sharpened” for another!
Quote: SuberSeb
Not in stores, because he doesn’t need anyone. And you can order here. And there is a description where not a word is said about the "military". For office needs.
It is precisely that simple users do not need it in FIG. And why then ours still buy this "Elbrus" if it is, as you say, "worse than Intela in everything"? In which office establishments is Elbrus most in demand? Why not Intel? The answer to all questions is its purpose. And we already spoke about the goal.
Quote: SuberSeb
800 MHz in 2017 is definitely something to be proud of.
Where do you get this info? If you are talking about the state of our line of processors for 2017, then here are the characteristics of the new Elbrus 8C:
Processor - 8 cores without hypertreading.
The crystal area is 350 mm2.
The cache of the second level for each core is 512 Sq.
Layer 3 cache is shared - 16 MB.
Execution per cycle - 30 operations.
Performance (peak) - 250 Gflops.
Power - 60-90 watts.
Licensed independence from Intel, while providing support for major operating systems with x86 / x86-64 architecture.
The crystal area is 350 mm2.
The cache of the second level for each core is 512 Sq.
Layer 3 cache is shared - 16 MB.
Execution per cycle - 30 operations.
Performance (peak) - 250 Gflops.
Power - 60-90 watts.
Licensed independence from Intel, while providing support for major operating systems with x86 / x86-64 architecture.
You just got used to the fact that the power of the processor is measured by the way it pulls modern games. And this, by the way, is correct, but for processors that are aimed at a wide range of consumers. Here, such a scheme will not work, a slightly different scope.
So it goes.
FarmerKarwer 07/27/2017, 09:01:31
Quote: SuberSeb
For the military or not, the developers say that it can also be used for office purposes. The scope is as follows: information security, operating temperature range, product life cycle duration. That is, the scope of military needs is not limited. Since he is for military purposes, then why can any mortal buy it? Truly military-oriented products are not handed out for reviews.
In my opinion, I clearly wrote that the main feature of Elbrus is its computing power. Why does he not pull the game, despite its high performance (by the way, the 4C processor's efficiency is comparable to the Intel “i” series processors. With less power consumption (45 W) its performance is up to 50 GFlops. For comparison: the older Intel Core i7- Does the 975 Extreme Edition have a performance of 53 Gflops at much higher frequencies and power consumption)?
The answer to the question is simple: our processor is simply “sharpened” for another!
Quote: SuberSeb
Not in stores, because he doesn’t need anyone. And you can order here. And there is a description where not a word is said about the "military". For office needs.
It is precisely that simple users do not need it in FIG. And why then ours still buy this "Elbrus" if it is, as you say, "worse than Intela in everything"? In which office establishments is Elbrus most in demand? Why not Intel? The answer to all questions is its purpose. And we already spoke about the goal.
Quote: SuberSeb
800 MHz in 2017 is definitely something to be proud of.
Where do you get this info? If you are talking about the state of our line of processors for 2017, then here are the characteristics of the new Elbrus 8C:
Processor - 8 cores without hypertreading.
The crystal area is 350 mm2.
The cache of the second level for each core is 512 Sq.
Layer 3 cache is shared - 16 MB.
Execution per cycle - 30 operations.
Performance (peak) - 250 Gflops.
Power - 60-90 watts.
Licensed independence from Intel, while providing support for major operating systems with x86 / x86-64 architecture.
The crystal area is 350 mm2.
The cache of the second level for each core is 512 Sq.
Layer 3 cache is shared - 16 MB.
Execution per cycle - 30 operations.
Performance (peak) - 250 Gflops.
Power - 60-90 watts.
Licensed independence from Intel, while providing support for major operating systems with x86 / x86-64 architecture.
You just got used to the fact that the power of the processor is measured by the way it pulls modern games. And this, by the way, is correct, but for processors that are aimed at a wide range of consumers. Here, such a scheme will not work, a slightly different scope.
So it goes.
FarmerKarwer 07/27/2017, 09:01:31
Quote: SuberSeb
For the military or not, the developers say that it can also be used for office purposes. The scope is as follows: information security, operating temperature range, product life cycle duration. That is, the scope of military needs is not limited. Since he is for military purposes, then why can any mortal buy it? Truly military-oriented products are not handed out for reviews.
In my opinion, I clearly wrote that the main feature of Elbrus is its computing power. Why does he not pull the game, despite its high performance (by the way, the 4C processor's efficiency is comparable to the Intel “i” series processors. With less power consumption (45 W) its performance is up to 50 GFlops. For comparison: the older Intel Core i7- Does the 975 Extreme Edition have a performance of 53 Gflops at much higher frequencies and power consumption)?
The answer to the question is simple: our processor is simply “sharpened” for another!
Quote: SuberSeb
Not in stores, because he doesn’t need anyone. And you can order here. And there is a description where not a word is said about the "military". For office needs.
It is precisely that simple users do not need it in FIG. And why then ours still buy this "Elbrus" if it is, as you say, "worse than Intela in everything"? In which office establishments is Elbrus most in demand? Why not Intel? The answer to all questions is its purpose. And we already spoke about the goal.
Quote: SuberSeb
800 MHz in 2017 is definitely something to be proud of.
Where do you get this info? If you are talking about the state of our line of processors for 2017, then here are the characteristics of the new Elbrus 8C:
Processor - 8 cores without hypertreading.
The crystal area is 350 mm2.
The cache of the second level for each core is 512 Sq.
Layer 3 cache is shared - 16 MB.
Execution per cycle - 30 operations.
Performance (peak) - 250 Gflops.
Power - 60-90 watts.
Licensed independence from Intel, while providing support for major operating systems with x86 / x86-64 architecture.
The crystal area is 350 mm2.
The cache of the second level for each core is 512 Sq.
Layer 3 cache is shared - 16 MB.
Execution per cycle - 30 operations.
Performance (peak) - 250 Gflops.
Power - 60-90 watts.
Licensed independence from Intel, while providing support for major operating systems with x86 / x86-64 architecture.
You just got used to the fact that the power of the processor is measured by the way it pulls modern games. And this, by the way, is correct, but for processors that are aimed at a wide range of consumers. Here, such a scheme will not work, a slightly different scope.
So it goes.
FarmerKarwer 07/27/2017, 09:01:31
Quote: SuberSeb
For the military or not, the developers say that it can also be used for office purposes. The scope is as follows: information security, operating temperature range, product life cycle duration. That is, the scope of military needs is not limited. Since he is for military purposes, then why can any mortal buy it? Truly military-oriented products are not handed out for reviews.
In my opinion, I clearly wrote that the main feature of Elbrus is its computing power. Why does he not pull the game, despite its high performance (by the way, the 4C processor's efficiency is comparable to the Intel “i” series processors. With less power consumption (45 W) its performance is up to 50 GFlops. For comparison: the older Intel Core i7- Does the 975 Extreme Edition have a performance of 53 Gflops at much higher frequencies and power consumption)?
The answer to the question is simple: our processor is simply “sharpened” for another!
Quote: SuberSeb
Not in stores, because he doesn’t need anyone. And you can order here. And there is a description where not a word is said about the "military". For office needs.
It is precisely that simple users do not need it in FIG. And why then ours still buy this "Elbrus" if it is, as you say, "worse than Intela in everything"? In which office establishments is Elbrus most in demand? Why not Intel? The answer to all questions is its purpose. And we already spoke about the goal.
Quote: SuberSeb
800 MHz in 2017 is definitely something to be proud of.
Where do you get this info? If you are talking about the state of our line of processors for 2017, then here are the characteristics of the new Elbrus 8C:
Processor - 8 cores without hypertreading.
The crystal area is 350 mm2.
The cache of the second level for each core is 512 Sq.
Layer 3 cache is shared - 16 MB.
Execution per cycle - 30 operations.
Performance (peak) - 250 Gflops.
Power - 60-90 watts.
Licensed independence from Intel, while providing support for major operating systems with x86 / x86-64 architecture.
The crystal area is 350 mm2.
The cache of the second level for each core is 512 Sq.
Layer 3 cache is shared - 16 MB.
Execution per cycle - 30 operations.
Performance (peak) - 250 Gflops.
Power - 60-90 watts.
Licensed independence from Intel, while providing support for major operating systems with x86 / x86-64 architecture.
You just got used to the fact that the power of the processor is measured by the way it pulls modern games. And this, by the way, is correct, but for processors that are aimed at a wide range of consumers. Here, such a scheme will not work, a slightly different scope.
So it goes.
FarmerKarwer 07/27/2017, 09:01:31
Lol, before you write about our engineers with a dumb sarcasm, you should know something.
The Elbrus processor is developed NOT FOR A WIDE PUBLIC, but FOR MILITARY NEEDS. Undoubtedly, Intel is significantly superior to the domestic processor in terms of launching games and other multimedia, but our creation is in many ways superior to its foreign counterparts in the “defense industry”. It must be understood that this product is being developed for the sole purpose of providing self-sufficient microelectronics and computer technology independent of deliveries and licensing. Computers on the Elbrus processor with an increased level of security and protection against computer viruses are in demand in the military industry and in services. That is, its main feature is computing power.
What kind of toys are there. Anyway, have you ever seen Elbrus in electronics stores?)
P.S. The latest version of Elbrus is 8C, it is five times more productive than 4C.
FarmerKarwer 07/27/2017, 18:24:00
The Elbrus processor is developed NOT FOR A WIDE PUBLIC, but FOR MILITARY NEEDS. Undoubtedly, Intel is significantly superior to the domestic processor in terms of launching games and other multimedia, but our creation is in many ways superior to its foreign counterparts in the “defense industry”. It must be understood that this product is being developed for the sole purpose of providing self-sufficient microelectronics and computer technology independent of deliveries and licensing. Computers on the Elbrus processor with an increased level of security and protection against computer viruses are in demand in the military industry and in services. That is, its main feature is computing power.
What kind of toys are there. Anyway, have you ever seen Elbrus in electronics stores?)
P.S. The latest version of Elbrus is 8C, it is five times more productive than 4C.
FarmerKarwer 07/27/2017, 18:24:00
Lol, before you write about our engineers with a dumb sarcasm, you should know something.
The Elbrus processor is developed NOT FOR A WIDE PUBLIC, but FOR MILITARY NEEDS. Undoubtedly, Intel is significantly superior to the domestic processor in terms of launching games and other multimedia, but our creation is in many ways superior to its foreign counterparts in the “defense industry”. It must be understood that this product is being developed for the sole purpose of providing self-sufficient microelectronics and computer technology independent of deliveries and licensing. Computers on the Elbrus processor with an increased level of security and protection against computer viruses are in demand in the military industry and in services. That is, its main feature is computing power.
What kind of toys are there. Anyway, have you ever seen Elbrus in electronics stores?)
P.S. The latest version of Elbrus is 8C, it is five times more productive than 4C.
FarmerKarwer 07/27/2017, 18:24:00
The Elbrus processor is developed NOT FOR A WIDE PUBLIC, but FOR MILITARY NEEDS. Undoubtedly, Intel is significantly superior to the domestic processor in terms of launching games and other multimedia, but our creation is in many ways superior to its foreign counterparts in the “defense industry”. It must be understood that this product is being developed for the sole purpose of providing self-sufficient microelectronics and computer technology independent of deliveries and licensing. Computers on the Elbrus processor with an increased level of security and protection against computer viruses are in demand in the military industry and in services. That is, its main feature is computing power.
What kind of toys are there. Anyway, have you ever seen Elbrus in electronics stores?)
P.S. The latest version of Elbrus is 8C, it is five times more productive than 4C.
FarmerKarwer 07/27/2017, 18:24:00
Lol, before you write about our engineers with a dumb sarcasm, you should know something.
The Elbrus processor is developed NOT FOR A WIDE PUBLIC, but FOR MILITARY NEEDS. Undoubtedly, Intel is significantly superior to the domestic processor in terms of launching games and other multimedia, but our creation is in many ways superior to its foreign counterparts in the “defense industry”. It must be understood that this product is being developed for the sole purpose of providing self-sufficient microelectronics and computer technology independent of deliveries and licensing. Computers on the Elbrus processor with an increased level of security and protection against computer viruses are in demand in the military industry and in services. That is, its main feature is computing power.
What kind of toys are there. Anyway, have you ever seen Elbrus in electronics stores?)
P.S. The latest version of Elbrus is 8C, it is five times more productive than 4C.
FarmerKarwer 07/27/2017, 18:24:00
The Elbrus processor is developed NOT FOR A WIDE PUBLIC, but FOR MILITARY NEEDS. Undoubtedly, Intel is significantly superior to the domestic processor in terms of launching games and other multimedia, but our creation is in many ways superior to its foreign counterparts in the “defense industry”. It must be understood that this product is being developed for the sole purpose of providing self-sufficient microelectronics and computer technology independent of deliveries and licensing. Computers on the Elbrus processor with an increased level of security and protection against computer viruses are in demand in the military industry and in services. That is, its main feature is computing power.
What kind of toys are there. Anyway, have you ever seen Elbrus in electronics stores?)
P.S. The latest version of Elbrus is 8C, it is five times more productive than 4C.
FarmerKarwer 07/27/2017, 18:24:00
Lol, before you write about our engineers with a dumb sarcasm, you should know something.
The Elbrus processor is developed NOT FOR A WIDE PUBLIC, but FOR MILITARY NEEDS. Undoubtedly, Intel is significantly superior to the domestic processor in terms of launching games and other multimedia, but our creation is in many ways superior to its foreign counterparts in the “defense industry”. It must be understood that this product is being developed for the sole purpose of providing self-sufficient microelectronics and computer technology independent of deliveries and licensing. Computers on the Elbrus processor with an increased level of security and protection against computer viruses are in demand in the military industry and in services. That is, its main feature is computing power.
What kind of toys are there. Anyway, have you ever seen Elbrus in electronics stores?)
P.S. The latest version of Elbrus is 8C, it is five times more productive than 4C.
FarmerKarwer 07/27/2017, 18:24:00
The Elbrus processor is developed NOT FOR A WIDE PUBLIC, but FOR MILITARY NEEDS. Undoubtedly, Intel is significantly superior to the domestic processor in terms of launching games and other multimedia, but our creation is in many ways superior to its foreign counterparts in the “defense industry”. It must be understood that this product is being developed for the sole purpose of providing self-sufficient microelectronics and computer technology independent of deliveries and licensing. Computers on the Elbrus processor with an increased level of security and protection against computer viruses are in demand in the military industry and in services. That is, its main feature is computing power.
What kind of toys are there. Anyway, have you ever seen Elbrus in electronics stores?)
P.S. The latest version of Elbrus is 8C, it is five times more productive than 4C.
FarmerKarwer 07/27/2017, 18:24:00
The plot is both dumb and funny. I like to play cleo missions, because this is a rarity, so I’ll be happy to put a plus
Thanks for the feedback. As for this, I can only say that you yourself do not judge the entire project solely on the review of Vir. Many people played to the end and rated the project (Saturnfan, YSV, DumPlay, WMMIPOPO, BurgerKo, wir - this list can be continued further), while the downloads are MUCH MORE than the ratings. And you, I wonder, who will you bring here, who did not fully play, except Asindu27a?
Of course, no one is going to dispute this. I will say more, without their help there would be no project. But ... agree ... what can a scripter miscalculate? In coding? The project is completely different, and it's silly to compare the work of scripters and work in DYOM itself.
I understood it before the release of the review, namely, the not-well-developed project. It could have been better done, but I hurried. The next time this will not happen again.
FarmerKarwer 09/21/2017, 05:38:37