But it already looks good. If you do not pay attention to too hard shadows (you could make them softer, anyway) and the curved geometry of the original SA.
Btv, I'm sorry for that srach, but ENB is really crap, as for me. Here I am with my opinion. But it was possible without srach, yes. And the transition to personalities is already the last thing.
A very funny comment, it's a pity that everything I want to write to you does not fit because of the site’s limitations. Sit further, think that your “criticism” is very appropriate and at least useful to someone.
Btv, you can split it into two comments, if you want to, lol. And the ENB is really crap. And I think my minus is not only appropriate, but also reasoned. It’s not worth it to aggro like this, you are not your group in contact.
Round! And now it's my turn. Firstly, it’s how much you got burned, that you already registered here to answer me in the comments on your under-adjustment, lol. Secondly, oce, let's move on to the main part. I won’t even say that your settings, in principle, do not carry anything breakthrough and new, they are absolutely identical. About the screenshots. Okay, I see a stolen from the pack with DoF effects, some kind of dumb pallet, and reduced reflections. And you protect it? Brother, yes it’s really little different from the source. If only because you really didn’t do nichrome. Look at what McFly, or the author of Direct, does. This is really suitable. What about you? You have some mockery, seriously. The maximum that you are capable of is to correct a couple of lines in configs, and to post-effects with models for "beautiful" screens. Seriously. The era of settings has passed a long time ago, and you all play with it, perceiving your "work" on serious cabbage soup.
Since you admitted that you "took part in the development." Isn't it a shame to fly a hike, huh?)
UPD: Yes, he’s even on your screenshots curve, lol. What is this crooked flower garden? What kind of crooked shadows? What is the DOF curve? MDE. Even arguing does not make sense. If you are comfortable sitting in 2013, when the ENB was still considered something of a sort, then sit, okay. I won’t pull you from your swamp. Continue to boast about your "work".)
Round! And now it's my turn. Firstly, it’s how much you got burned, that you already registered here to answer me in the comments on your under-adjustment, lol. Secondly, oce, let's move on to the main part. I won’t even say that your settings, in principle, do not carry anything breakthrough and new, they are absolutely identical. About the screenshots. Okay, I see a stolen from the pack with DoF effects, some kind of dumb pallet, and reduced reflections. And you protect it? Brother, yes it’s really little different from the source. If only because you really didn’t do nichrome. Look at what McFly, or the author of Direct, does. This is really suitable. What about you? You have some mockery, seriously. The maximum that you are capable of is to correct a couple of lines in configs, and to post-effects with models for "beautiful" screens. Seriously. The era of settings has passed a long time ago, and you all play with it, perceiving your "work" on serious cabbage soup.
Since you admitted that you "took part in the development." Isn't it a shame to fly a hike, huh?)
UPD: Yes, he’s even on your screenshots curve, lol. What is this crooked flower garden? What kind of crooked shadows? What is the DOF curve? MDE. Even arguing does not make sense. If you are comfortable sitting in 2013, when the ENB was still considered something of a sort, then sit, okay. I won’t pull you from your swamp. Continue to boast about your "work".)
Round! And now it's my turn. Firstly, it’s how much you got burned, that you already registered here to answer me in the comments on your under-adjustment, lol. Secondly, oce, let's move on to the main part. I won’t even say that your settings, in principle, do not carry anything breakthrough and new, they are absolutely identical. About the screenshots. Okay, I see a stolen from the pack with DoF effects, some kind of dumb pallet, and reduced reflections. And you protect it? Brother, yes it’s really little different from the source. If only because you really didn’t do nichrome. Look at what McFly, or the author of Direct, does. This is really suitable. What about you? You have some mockery, seriously. The maximum that you are capable of is to correct a couple of lines in configs, and to post-effects with models for "beautiful" screens. Seriously. The era of settings has passed a long time ago, and you all play with it, perceiving your "work" on serious cabbage soup.
Since you admitted that you "took part in the development." Isn't it a shame to fly a hike, huh?)
UPD: Yes, he’s even on your screenshots curve, lol. What is this crooked flower garden? What kind of crooked shadows? What is the DOF curve? MDE. Even arguing does not make sense. If you are comfortable sitting in 2013, when the ENB was still considered something of a sort, then sit, okay. I won’t pull you from your swamp. Continue to boast about your "work".)
Round! And now it's my turn. Firstly, it’s how much you got burned, that you already registered here to answer me in the comments on your under-adjustment, lol. Secondly, oce, let's move on to the main part. I won’t even say that your settings, in principle, do not carry anything breakthrough and new, they are absolutely identical. About the screenshots. Okay, I see a stolen from the pack with DoF effects, some kind of dumb pallet, and reduced reflections. And you protect it? Brother, yes it’s really little different from the source. If only because you really didn’t do nichrome. Look at what McFly, or the author of Direct, does. This is really suitable. What about you? You have some mockery, seriously. The maximum that you are capable of is to correct a couple of lines in configs, and to post-effects with models for "beautiful" screens. Seriously. The era of settings has passed a long time ago, and you all play with it, perceiving your "work" on serious cabbage soup.
Since you admitted that you "took part in the development." Isn't it a shame to fly a hike, huh?)
UPD: Yes, he’s even on your screenshots curve, lol. What is this crooked flower garden? What kind of crooked shadows? What is the DOF curve? MDE. Even arguing does not make sense. If you are comfortable sitting in 2013, when the ENB was still considered something of a sort, then sit, okay. I won’t pull you from your swamp. Continue to boast about your "work".)
So, padaji. "Naked Misaki Casual" ?. Either I don’t understand something in this life, or is nudity its everyday appearance? This is to what Misaki would simply write. Because casual is not a last name. Don't learn anything.
The stock setting for this version. As if he had downloaded it, he didn’t change anything much. Believe me, I compared. Just like that, I would not write it.
Oh, the minus sign from the author flew in. Offended by the applause. Of course. Why fill in with a pack when you can fill in almost one retexture. And litter the archive.
By the way, not so long ago we completed the creation of the foreign project Cowboys: The Tale Of Betty Shore, where the storyline is generally similar to The Last Chord, I would advise the author to go through it.
But this is already good. I love it when fashion, it would seem, to improve textures, is not out of the general canvas, and does not ripple in the eyes. Previously, almost all the modes on HD-textures were rippling like creatures, if cho. Plus, in short. It's good.
and for the same ShadowPla I need a very good hardware which not everyone has).
Well I do not know. My hardware is not that top-notch, but Shad works like a clock, it’s also a record in gorgeous quality. So I don’t know. Yes, and it was about the benchmark. And benchmarks absolutely do not care about iron, btv. Toad, to track the numbers of FPS, Shad can be used regardless of the discharge of glands.
Man, are you serious? Why then do leave a comment and climb here if you haven’t played? To notify everyone that the battle does not make sense because you did not play, m?
And on sabzh. He played both this and that. And, as it were, Fog of the Dead looks much more interesting than the likeness of some MTA DayZ based on a single GTA with such a plot and typical modes. This is subjective. Objectively, FOTD is much more developed than ZA. ZA is - "Rolled scripts, models from L4D and other things on the map and rails of the standard game - and that's it, the mod is ready." In FOTD, it’s much more changed, replaced, however you want, but the development is much better and more EXPLICIT. And, the most interesting thing is that everything is copyright. Therefore, my voice goes to Fog of the Dead. But in general, yes. The person who deals with such battles, selections, and other things, I personally appeal to you. Pushing a complete (albeit half empty) mod and demo box is a bad idea. I am everything.
Man, are you serious? Why then do leave a comment and climb here if you haven’t played? To notify everyone that the battle does not make sense because you did not play, m?
And on sabzh. He played both this and that. And, as it were, Fog of the Dead looks much more interesting than the likeness of some MTA DayZ based on a single GTA with such a plot and typical modes. This is subjective. Objectively, FOTD is much more developed than ZA. ZA is - "Rolled scripts, models from L4D and other things on the map and rails of the standard game - and that's it, the mod is ready." In FOTD, it’s much more changed, replaced, however you want, but the development is much better and more EXPLICIT. And, the most interesting thing is that everything is copyright. Therefore, my voice goes to Fog of the Dead. But in general, yes. The person who deals with such battles, selections, and other things, I personally appeal to you. Pushing a complete (albeit half empty) mod and demo box is a bad idea. I am everything.
Man, are you serious? Why then do leave a comment and climb here if you haven’t played? To notify everyone that the battle does not make sense because you did not play, m?
And on sabzh. He played both this and that. And, as it were, Fog of the Dead looks much more interesting than the likeness of some MTA DayZ based on a single GTA with such a plot and typical modes. This is subjective. Objectively, FOTD is much more developed than ZA. ZA is - "Rolled scripts, models from L4D and other things on the map and rails of the standard game - and that's it, the mod is ready." In FOTD, it’s much more changed, replaced, however you want, but the development is much better and more EXPLICIT. And, the most interesting thing is that everything is copyright. Therefore, my voice goes to Fog of the Dead. But in general, yes. The person who deals with such battles, selections, and other things, I personally appeal to you. Pushing a complete (albeit half empty) mod and demo box is a bad idea. I am everything.
Man, are you serious? Why then do leave a comment and climb here if you haven’t played? To notify everyone that the battle does not make sense because you did not play, m?
And on sabzh. He played both this and that. And, as it were, Fog of the Dead looks much more interesting than the likeness of some MTA DayZ based on a single GTA with such a plot and typical modes. This is subjective. Objectively, FOTD is much more developed than ZA. ZA is - "Rolled scripts, models from L4D and other things on the map and rails of the standard game - and that's it, the mod is ready." In FOTD, it’s much more changed, replaced, however you want, but the development is much better and more EXPLICIT. And, the most interesting thing is that everything is copyright. Therefore, my voice goes to Fog of the Dead. But in general, yes. The person who deals with such battles, selections, and other things, I personally appeal to you. Pushing a complete (albeit half empty) mod and demo box is a bad idea. I am everything.
Interested in the project since the announcement. Now he passed (not too lazy to lay out his missions for the sake of this), and did not regret at all. Perhaps the most successful project in this genre in recent years. When there is only fucking thrash everywhere, psychedelics and stuff, it's a bit like a breath of fresh air. In general, thanks for the project, it worked.
Yeah, another machinima in the universe of the film, it's clear. Okay, maybe it's not so critical. When machinima comes out, I will bomb under it. Or I won't. Let's see. And according to the teaser. Why are you lying? There is no trace of the CX atmosphere. Even a movie. First. Make the image more "dirty", for the CX universe is built on the feeling of disgust Second. CX without noise effect? Riley? Third. I hope the plot does not disappoint, because the bar for CX has been raised very high in terms of plot, so there is a huge chance of simply not reaching it. We are waiting, what is already there. But criticism is inevitable, fact. CX for me personally is a very serious topic, so I will find fault with every little thing.
The post has been edited by {Chemist} on 07-26-2015 at 13:58:42
Yes, seriously, even in the original name indicated in the description, it is written correctly.
So lazy to do your job has become?
They don’t learn anything.
Btv, I'm sorry for that srach, but ENB is really crap, as for me. Here I am with my opinion. But it was possible without srach, yes. And the transition to personalities is already the last thing.
Yes podizlikali comments each other.
Btv, you can split it into two comments, if you want to, lol.
And the ENB is really crap. And I think my minus is not only appropriate, but also reasoned.
It’s not worth it to aggro like this, you are not your group in contact.
And now it's my turn.
Firstly, it’s how much you got burned, that you already registered here to answer me in the comments on your under-adjustment, lol.
Secondly, oce, let's move on to the main part.
I won’t even say that your settings, in principle, do not carry anything breakthrough and new, they are absolutely identical.
About the screenshots.
Okay, I see a stolen from the pack with DoF effects, some kind of dumb pallet, and reduced reflections. And you protect it?
Brother, yes it’s really little different from the source. If only because you really didn’t do nichrome.
Look at what McFly, or the author of Direct, does.
This is really suitable. What about you? You have some mockery, seriously.
The maximum that you are capable of is to correct a couple of lines in configs, and to post-effects with models for "beautiful" screens.
Seriously. The era of settings has passed a long time ago, and you all play with it, perceiving your "work" on serious cabbage soup.
Since you admitted that you "took part in the development." Isn't it a shame to fly a hike, huh?)
UPD: Yes, he’s even on your screenshots curve, lol. What is this crooked flower garden? What kind of crooked shadows? What is the DOF curve?
MDE. Even arguing does not make sense. If you are comfortable sitting in 2013, when the ENB was still considered something of a sort, then sit, okay. I won’t pull you from your swamp.
Continue to boast about your "work".)
zHusky 05/25/2019, 08:18:44!
And now it's my turn.
Firstly, it’s how much you got burned, that you already registered here to answer me in the comments on your under-adjustment, lol.
Secondly, oce, let's move on to the main part.
I won’t even say that your settings, in principle, do not carry anything breakthrough and new, they are absolutely identical.
About the screenshots.
Okay, I see a stolen from the pack with DoF effects, some kind of dumb pallet, and reduced reflections. And you protect it?
Brother, yes it’s really little different from the source. If only because you really didn’t do nichrome.
Look at what McFly, or the author of Direct, does.
This is really suitable. What about you? You have some mockery, seriously.
The maximum that you are capable of is to correct a couple of lines in configs, and to post-effects with models for "beautiful" screens.
Seriously. The era of settings has passed a long time ago, and you all play with it, perceiving your "work" on serious cabbage soup.
Since you admitted that you "took part in the development." Isn't it a shame to fly a hike, huh?)
UPD: Yes, he’s even on your screenshots curve, lol. What is this crooked flower garden? What kind of crooked shadows? What is the DOF curve?
MDE. Even arguing does not make sense. If you are comfortable sitting in 2013, when the ENB was still considered something of a sort, then sit, okay. I won’t pull you from your swamp.
Continue to boast about your "work".)
zHusky 05/25/2019, 08:18:44!
And now it's my turn.
Firstly, it’s how much you got burned, that you already registered here to answer me in the comments on your under-adjustment, lol.
Secondly, oce, let's move on to the main part.
I won’t even say that your settings, in principle, do not carry anything breakthrough and new, they are absolutely identical.
About the screenshots.
Okay, I see a stolen from the pack with DoF effects, some kind of dumb pallet, and reduced reflections. And you protect it?
Brother, yes it’s really little different from the source. If only because you really didn’t do nichrome.
Look at what McFly, or the author of Direct, does.
This is really suitable. What about you? You have some mockery, seriously.
The maximum that you are capable of is to correct a couple of lines in configs, and to post-effects with models for "beautiful" screens.
Seriously. The era of settings has passed a long time ago, and you all play with it, perceiving your "work" on serious cabbage soup.
Since you admitted that you "took part in the development." Isn't it a shame to fly a hike, huh?)
UPD: Yes, he’s even on your screenshots curve, lol. What is this crooked flower garden? What kind of crooked shadows? What is the DOF curve?
MDE. Even arguing does not make sense. If you are comfortable sitting in 2013, when the ENB was still considered something of a sort, then sit, okay. I won’t pull you from your swamp.
Continue to boast about your "work".)
zHusky 05/25/2019, 08:18:44!
And now it's my turn.
Firstly, it’s how much you got burned, that you already registered here to answer me in the comments on your under-adjustment, lol.
Secondly, oce, let's move on to the main part.
I won’t even say that your settings, in principle, do not carry anything breakthrough and new, they are absolutely identical.
About the screenshots.
Okay, I see a stolen from the pack with DoF effects, some kind of dumb pallet, and reduced reflections. And you protect it?
Brother, yes it’s really little different from the source. If only because you really didn’t do nichrome.
Look at what McFly, or the author of Direct, does.
This is really suitable. What about you? You have some mockery, seriously.
The maximum that you are capable of is to correct a couple of lines in configs, and to post-effects with models for "beautiful" screens.
Seriously. The era of settings has passed a long time ago, and you all play with it, perceiving your "work" on serious cabbage soup.
Since you admitted that you "took part in the development." Isn't it a shame to fly a hike, huh?)
UPD: Yes, he’s even on your screenshots curve, lol. What is this crooked flower garden? What kind of crooked shadows? What is the DOF curve?
MDE. Even arguing does not make sense. If you are comfortable sitting in 2013, when the ENB was still considered something of a sort, then sit, okay. I won’t pull you from your swamp.
Continue to boast about your "work".)
zHusky 05/25/2019, 08:18:44!
This is to what Misaki would simply write. Because casual is not a last name.
Don't learn anything.
Well, thank you. And then the person seems to have problems with perception.
They ran, btv, the inhabitants of one ENB group to protect this file. Looks funny lol.
The stock setting for this version. As if he had downloaded it, he didn’t change anything much. Believe me, I compared. Just like that, I would not write it.
No, I explained to you the reason for the high weight of the file, brother.
Of course. Why fill in with a pack when you can fill in almost one retexture.
And litter the archive.
zHusky 05/11/2019, 10:52:08
It doesn’t bother you to get fat.
To weight?
Models + sound. It's simple, lol.
Thank you, I’ll go through the other day.)
I love it when fashion, it would seem, to improve textures, is not out of the general canvas, and does not ripple in the eyes. Previously, almost all the modes on HD-textures were rippling like creatures, if cho.
Plus, in short. It's good.
Well I do not know. My hardware is not that top-notch, but Shad works like a clock, it’s also a record in gorgeous quality. So I don’t know.
Yes, and it was about the benchmark. And benchmarks absolutely do not care about iron, btv.
Toad, to track the numbers of FPS, Shad can be used regardless of the discharge of glands.
I confirm NVIDIA. We have Shadowplay and so on.
And why is the topic called "Russian flavor of the zero", but the vast majority of mods have nothing to do with the topic?
Man, are you serious? Why then do leave a comment and climb here if you haven’t played? To notify everyone that the battle does not make sense because you did not play, m?
And on sabzh. He played both this and that. And, as it were, Fog of the Dead looks much more interesting than the likeness of some MTA DayZ based on a single GTA with such a plot and typical modes. This is subjective.
Objectively, FOTD is much more developed than ZA. ZA is - "Rolled scripts, models from L4D and other things on the map and rails of the standard game - and that's it, the mod is ready."
In FOTD, it’s much more changed, replaced, however you want, but the development is much better and more EXPLICIT. And, the most interesting thing is that everything is copyright.
Therefore, my voice goes to Fog of the Dead. But in general, yes. The person who deals with such battles, selections, and other things, I personally appeal to you. Pushing a complete (albeit half empty) mod and demo box is a bad idea.
I am everything.
Man, are you serious? Why then do leave a comment and climb here if you haven’t played? To notify everyone that the battle does not make sense because you did not play, m?
And on sabzh. He played both this and that. And, as it were, Fog of the Dead looks much more interesting than the likeness of some MTA DayZ based on a single GTA with such a plot and typical modes. This is subjective.
Objectively, FOTD is much more developed than ZA. ZA is - "Rolled scripts, models from L4D and other things on the map and rails of the standard game - and that's it, the mod is ready."
In FOTD, it’s much more changed, replaced, however you want, but the development is much better and more EXPLICIT. And, the most interesting thing is that everything is copyright.
Therefore, my voice goes to Fog of the Dead. But in general, yes. The person who deals with such battles, selections, and other things, I personally appeal to you. Pushing a complete (albeit half empty) mod and demo box is a bad idea.
I am everything.
Man, are you serious? Why then do leave a comment and climb here if you haven’t played? To notify everyone that the battle does not make sense because you did not play, m?
And on sabzh. He played both this and that. And, as it were, Fog of the Dead looks much more interesting than the likeness of some MTA DayZ based on a single GTA with such a plot and typical modes. This is subjective.
Objectively, FOTD is much more developed than ZA. ZA is - "Rolled scripts, models from L4D and other things on the map and rails of the standard game - and that's it, the mod is ready."
In FOTD, it’s much more changed, replaced, however you want, but the development is much better and more EXPLICIT. And, the most interesting thing is that everything is copyright.
Therefore, my voice goes to Fog of the Dead. But in general, yes. The person who deals with such battles, selections, and other things, I personally appeal to you. Pushing a complete (albeit half empty) mod and demo box is a bad idea.
I am everything.
Man, are you serious? Why then do leave a comment and climb here if you haven’t played? To notify everyone that the battle does not make sense because you did not play, m?
And on sabzh. He played both this and that. And, as it were, Fog of the Dead looks much more interesting than the likeness of some MTA DayZ based on a single GTA with such a plot and typical modes. This is subjective.
Objectively, FOTD is much more developed than ZA. ZA is - "Rolled scripts, models from L4D and other things on the map and rails of the standard game - and that's it, the mod is ready."
In FOTD, it’s much more changed, replaced, however you want, but the development is much better and more EXPLICIT. And, the most interesting thing is that everything is copyright.
Therefore, my voice goes to Fog of the Dead. But in general, yes. The person who deals with such battles, selections, and other things, I personally appeal to you. Pushing a complete (albeit half empty) mod and demo box is a bad idea.
I am everything.
The time cycle does not affect this. Affects DoF. You can turn it off after all.
In general, thanks for the project, it worked.
I left, don’t worry about it
The last thing to dig
http://steamcommunity.com/app/271590/discussions/0/1697168437868229561/?ctp=3#c1
697168437869831938
https://pp.userapi.com/c845120/v845120395/11244/yibM1ZMKzBk.jpg
Okay, maybe it's not so critical. When machinima comes out, I will bomb under it.
Or I won't.
Let's see.
And according to the teaser. Why are you lying? There is no trace of the CX atmosphere. Even a movie.
First. Make the image more "dirty", for the CX universe is built on the feeling of disgust
Second. CX without noise effect? Riley?
Third. I hope the plot does not disappoint, because the bar for CX has been raised very high in terms of plot, so there is a huge chance of simply not reaching it.
We are waiting, what is already there. But criticism is inevitable, fact. CX for me personally is a very serious topic, so I will find fault with every little thing.
The post has been edited by {Chemist} on 07-26-2015 at 13:58:42
Travi $ Scott - Chaz Interlude